<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open source &#8211; more or less secure than closed source?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?feed=rss2&#038;p=411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=411</link>
	<description>[Secure] Messages from Sendmail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:36:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anand</title>
		<link>http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=411&#038;cpage=1#comment-3789</link>
		<dc:creator>anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=411#comment-3789</guid>
		<description>By making closed source tradition some big players in Software Industry tried to make their product secure, but truth is that their product is most vulnerable to security threats ! We have seen all sort of virus attacks on Windows machines. Compared to this, open source applications ( Linux), which I think are equally vulnerable, have been attacked less frequently. Reason to this I think is solution to attacks can be produced soon because of availability of code to open world. Open source I think has a little edge over closed source applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By making closed source tradition some big players in Software Industry tried to make their product secure, but truth is that their product is most vulnerable to security threats ! We have seen all sort of virus attacks on Windows machines. Compared to this, open source applications ( Linux), which I think are equally vulnerable, have been attacked less frequently. Reason to this I think is solution to attacks can be produced soon because of availability of code to open world. Open source I think has a little edge over closed source applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>