<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SecurityWeek: When to Deploy a Load Balancer for Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=1313</link>
	<description>[Secure] Messages from Sendmail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:36:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe Wolfhugel</title>
		<link>http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=1313&#038;cpage=1#comment-32425</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe Wolfhugel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=1313#comment-32425</guid>
		<description>Greg, I would add one point to your option (3) where Load Balancers make sense: if your traffic is high enough to require a high number of inbound servers, the use of load balancers (with several VIPs) would allow reducing the size of the MX records, i.e. you probably don&#039;t want 100 hosts in your MX record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, I would add one point to your option (3) where Load Balancers make sense: if your traffic is high enough to require a high number of inbound servers, the use of load balancers (with several VIPs) would allow reducing the size of the MX records, i.e. you probably don&#8217;t want 100 hosts in your MX record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>