<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving STARTTLS authentication in the Sendmail MTA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=1238</link>
	<description>[Secure] Messages from Sendmail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:36:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe Wolfhugel</title>
		<link>http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=1238&#038;cpage=1#comment-33103</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe Wolfhugel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 09:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=1238#comment-33103</guid>
		<description>Greg, you&#039;re absolutely right: names for the new options will have to be chosen carefully to avoid confusion with common acronyms. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, you&#8217;re absolutely right: names for the new options will have to be chosen carefully to avoid confusion with common acronyms. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=1238&#038;cpage=1#comment-33102</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sendmail.com/sm/blog/wik/?p=1238#comment-33102</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article.  In it, you recommend adding a new attribute called “CA” (as Cert Altnames) to the access database value.  I would recommend against &quot;CA&quot; as that is already a well known acronym for certificates (Certificate Authority).  Since there is nothing limiting those values to two characters, I would use something more descriptive such as &quot;Alt&quot; or &quot;AltName&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article.  In it, you recommend adding a new attribute called “CA” (as Cert Altnames) to the access database value.  I would recommend against &#8220;CA&#8221; as that is already a well known acronym for certificates (Certificate Authority).  Since there is nothing limiting those values to two characters, I would use something more descriptive such as &#8220;Alt&#8221; or &#8220;AltName&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>